When Lawyers Move: Leaving a Firm and Clearing the Lateral Hire

Hope A. Comisky
Hope A. Comisky
Griesing Law, LLC

Hope A. Comisky is a Member of Griesing Law, LLC, where she chairs both the Ethics & Professional Responsibility practice group and the Employment practice group and serves as General Counsel to the firm.

Robert S. Tintner
Robert S. Tintner
Fox Rothschild LLP

Robert S. Tintner is a Partner in the Philadelphia office of Fox Rothschild LLP, where a core part of his practice is representing and advising lawyers and law firms.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 10, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Every Lateral Move Puts Two Firms at Ethical Risk

Lawyers change firms more often than ever. Bar opinions and court decisions have raised the stakes for the lawyer who leaves and the firm that hires. North Carolina 2025 FEO 1, Texas Opinion 699 (2024), and NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-3 now speak directly to departures. On the hiring side, recent California and New Jersey decisions test whether ethical screens actually hold.

Block or delay client notice, and the firm creates its own ethics problem. Solicit clients before announcing, and the departing lawyer faces fiduciary and tortious interference exposure. Copy the wrong files, and ownership becomes a dispute. Penalize departure through pay, and Model Rule 5.6 comes into play. Hire a lateral without vetting, and a substantially related matter walks in the door. Build a weak screen, and the firm can be disqualified.

You walk out with a lateral screening checklist and a framework for client notice and file transfer. You also get a plan for opposing or conceding a disqualification motion. The panel turns ABA Formal Opinions 99-414 and 489 and current court decisions into clear guidance. That jurisdiction-specific judgment is exactly what a template or an AI summary cannot supply.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Client Notice Duties
    Determine who must notify clients, when notice goes out, and what the letter should say under North Carolina 2025 FEO 1 and Texas Opinion 699 (2024), including what to do when the firm refuses contact or written notice.
  • Pre-Departure Conduct Limits
    Identify where pre-departure planning crosses the fiduciary line into tortious interference exposure, from soliciting clients, attorneys, and staff to minimum notice-of-departure requirements.
  • Client File Rights
    Decide who owns the file, what the firm may keep, and what the departing lawyer may copy before leaving, including form files and contact lists.
  • Rule 5.6 Financial Disincentives
    Spot post-departure restrictions and pay structures that violate Model Rule 5.6, using recent Washington case law, NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-3, and jurisdictional variations.
  • Substantial Relationship Threshold
    Apply Rule 1.9 as the gating test before imputation or screening, then work through the ABA Model Rule 1.10(a)(2) framework as different jurisdictions apply it.
  • Screens and Disqualification Motions
    Build an ethical screen that survives court scrutiny and decide whether to oppose or concede a disqualification motion, guided by recent New Jersey and California decisions.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 10, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Hope A. Comisky, Chair | Griesing Law, LLC

Hope A. Comisky is a Member of Griesing Law, LLC, where she chairs both the Ethics & Professional Responsibility practice group and the Employment practice group and serves as General Counsel to the firm. For more than ten years she has advised lawyers and law firms on the rules of professional conduct, issuing ethics opinions and training in-house lawyers. She also brings more than 35 years of employment and litigation experience to her practice.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Comisky earned her B.A. from Cornell University and her J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. She then clerked for the Honorable Joseph L. McGlynn, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

She is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania, New York, and the District of Columbia, as well as before the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Third, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania.

  • Recognition & Leadership

For more than a decade, Ms. Comisky served as the lead professional responsibility attorney, and later General Counsel, for a law firm of more than 450 attorneys, where she also chaired the Professional Responsibility Committee. Over her career she has been a partner at three Philadelphia law firms.

Best Lawyers named her Philadelphia “Lawyer of the Year” for Labor and Employment and for Employment Law–Management, and she is regularly recognized by The Best Lawyers in America and Super Lawyers for employment law. Her other honors include selection as a Philadelphia Business Journal Best of the Bar honoree for employment litigation and as a Labor and Employment Star by Benchmark Litigation.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Comisky is an adjunct professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she teaches professional responsibility seminars. She lectures and writes frequently on professional responsibility and employment law, has published several articles in the ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, and has spoken for many years at the Northeast Regional Employment Law Institute on sexual harassment, defamation in the employment context, and tort claims arising from terminations.

She is a Fellow of the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers and chairs its Third Circuit selection committee. She also sits on the American Arbitration Association National Roster of Arbitrators and the CPR Panel of Distinguished Neutrals, and is part of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

  • Experience

Ms. Comisky’s professional responsibility work centers on giving lawyers and firms real-time guidance on the rules of professional conduct. As in-house ethics counsel, she advised and delivered educational programs to hundreds of attorneys, and she continues to issue ethics opinions and train in-house lawyers.

On the employment side, she counsels clients on workplace issues, trains managers and staff, and advises on employment litigation strategy. She has also arbitrated and mediated both employment and commercial disputes.

 

Robert S. Tintner, Partner | Fox Rothschild LLP

Robert S. Tintner is a Partner in the Philadelphia office of Fox Rothschild LLP, where a core part of his practice is representing and advising lawyers and law firms. He handles professional responsibility and legal malpractice matters, represents lawyers before the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board and the Pennsylvania Board of Bar Examiners, and is regularly retained as an expert on legal ethics, professional responsibility, and legal malpractice.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Tintner received his J.D. in 1994 from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he was a research assistant to Professor Lani Guinier, served as vice-chair for student affairs of the Graduate and Professional Students Assembly, and acted as liaison between graduate and professional students and the university trustees. He earned his B.A. in 1989 from the University of Pennsylvania School of Arts and Sciences.

He is admitted in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania and the District of New Jersey. He speaks French.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Tintner co-chairs the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Professional Guidance Committee. Within Fox Rothschild, he sits on the Professional Responsibility Committee, co-chairs the Pro Bono Committee, and serves on the Accounts Receivable, Billing and Collections Committee; he previously chaired the Summer Associate Coordinating Committee and served on the Recruitment Committee.

He has been listed in Super Lawyers for General Litigation in Pennsylvania (2022–2024) and was earlier named a Super Lawyers Rising Star in Litigation (2006). His service has been recognized with the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Citizens Bank Achievement Award (2020), the American Bar Association’s Making a Difference through Community Service Award (2016), the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania’s Pro Bono Roll of Honor (2015), and the Sean Peretta Award from the Young Lawyers Division of the Philadelphia Bar Association (2009).

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Tintner presents seminars across Pennsylvania on professional responsibility, avoiding legal malpractice, the Dragonetti Act, quiet title, and title insurance. He co-authored Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, published by The Legal Intelligencer.

He is a member of the American Bar Association, the Pennsylvania Bar Association, the New Jersey Bar Association, and the Philadelphia Bar Association. In the community, he serves on the board of directors of the Volunteers for the Indigent Program in Philadelphia and on the Tangled Title Fund Committee.

  • Experience

Mr. Tintner’s work for lawyers and law firms spans professional responsibility counseling, legal malpractice, disciplinary and bar admission proceedings, and claims for wrongful use of civil proceedings and abuse of process. He also handles defamation and First Amendment matters and is part of the firm’s Law Firm Defense & Risk Management practice.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Handling a Lawyer’s Departure: Client Notice, Files, and Firm Restrictions | Hope Comisky & Robert S. Tintner | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session explains what a lawyer and a firm must do when the lawyer leaves. It covers who must tell clients and when, who owns client files and how they move, and which post-departure restrictions and financial penalties are allowed under Model Rule 5.6. Attendees will learn how to give proper client notice, handle files correctly, and spot pay structures that violate the ethics rules. The session relies on various ethics opinions, including ABA Formal Opinions 99-414 and 489, North Carolina 2025 FEO 1, Texas Opinion 699 (2024), and NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2025-3 to give a current framework.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Screening the Lateral Hire and Defeating the Disqualification Motion | Hope Comisky & Robert S. Tintner | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session follows a lateral hire conflict from start to finish: deciding whether a prior matter is “substantially related,” applying each state’s screening rules, building an ethical wall that will hold up under court scrutiny, and responding when the other side moves to disqualify the firm. Attendees will learn how to vet lateral candidates, set up screens that comply with ABA Model Rule 1.10(a)(2) and court decisions, and use recent court decisions as a guide in responding when a motion is filed. Attendees leave with a screening checklist, tips to lower disqualification risks, and a plan for opposing or conceding a motion.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Dual

Texas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics / Professionalism

All courses accredited in Utah must include both ethics credits.
Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics

Washington

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Ethics Hours

Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, October 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
False Claims Act Hot Topics (2026 Edition)
False Claims Act Hot Topics (2026 Edition) Tue, November 3, 2026
Live Webcast
HIPAA Privacy, Security and AI – Oh My!
HIPAA Privacy, Security and AI – Oh My! Tue, November 3, 2026
Live Webcast