Marc S. Mayerson is the Principal of The Mayerson Firm PLLC in Washington, D.C., where he represents policyholders — businesses, nonprofits, directors, executives, and fiduciaries — in complex insurance coverage disputes.
Katherine J. Henry is a Partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP in Washington, D.C., where she chairs the firm's Policyholder Insurance Coverage team.
Live Video-Broadcast: November 3, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
Excess Insurers Can Now Be Sued Before a Single Upper Layer Attaches
The California Supreme Court decided Fox Paine & Co. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. in July 2026. Policyholders may now sue excess insurers across an entire layered tower before underlying limits are exhausted. The Court held unanimously that the implied covenant operates from policy inception, not from attachment. The serial-litigation staircase is gone.
Plead thinly and the demurrer succeeds. The reasonable-likelihood standard demands factual allegations, not labels. Ignore follow-form versus independent layer language and the exhaustion analysis collapses. Wait for attachment and the limitations clock runs against you. Miss the pre-attachment conduct — concealed evaluations, premature repudiation, stonewalled investigation — and the bad faith claim never forms.
Attendees walk out with a whole-tower complaint framework and a pre-attachment bad faith proof checklist. Damages theories run through Neal v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, documented settlement-participation invitations, and actuarial loss-trajectory projections. The jurisdictional map covers California, Florida, and New York’s pending S166A. This is practitioner judgment drawn from the decisions themselves.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: November 3, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Marc S. Mayerson, Principal | The Mayerson Firm PLLC
Marc S. Mayerson is the Principal of The Mayerson Firm PLLC in Washington, D.C., where he represents policyholders — businesses, nonprofits, directors, executives, and fiduciaries — in complex insurance coverage disputes. His practice reaches excess coverage and exhaustion, multi-layer insurance towers, directors and officers liability, and insurer bad faith, as well as asbestos, environmental cleanup, toxic tort, product liability, securities, ERISA fiduciary, employment practices, fidelity and dishonesty, first-party property, and business interruption claims. He also serves as an arbitrator, mediator, and expert in insurance matters.
Mr. Mayerson earned his Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1986, where he was a member of the Harvard Law Review. He received his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Michigan in 1983 with Highest Distinction and High Honors, and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. Following law school he served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Stephen R. Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mr. Mayerson is an elected Fellow of the American College of Coverage Counsel. He has been listed in Chambers USA, The Best Lawyers in America, and Super Lawyers, was named a Leading Lawyer in insurance by Legal Times, and is recognized in the Experts’ Guide to the World’s Leading Insurance and Reinsurance Lawyers.
Mr. Mayerson co-edits the New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide, the most widely used practice guide in the field. He has written on the duty to defend, notice requirements, integrated risk programs, environmental recovery, contaminated food losses, cyber risk, and insurance bad faith, and previously authored the insurance law blog Insurance Scrawl. He has taught insurance law at Georgetown University Law Center and the George Washington University Law School, testified before a United States Senate subcommittee on insurance issues affecting charities and nonprofits, and provided expert testimony to the ERISA Advisory Council on fiduciary fidelity bonds.
Mr. Mayerson’s coverage practice centers on recovery under excess and umbrella layers, including disputes over exhaustion, attachment, and allocation across multi-layer insurance towers, and on directors and officers coverage for executives and fiduciaries. He serves as an AAA-certified commercial arbitrator and insurance coverage neutral, was certified as a Storm Sandy insurance mediator, and sits as an arbitrator on the District of Columbia Bar Attorney-Client Arbitration Board.
Katherine J. Henry, Partner | Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Katherine J. Henry is a Partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP in Washington, D.C., where she chairs the firm’s Policyholder Insurance Coverage team. She represents policyholders in policy placement and renewals, claims management, and coverage litigation in the United States and abroad, advising Fortune 10 and other companies on complex insurance programs, including manuscript and specialty policies and multinational towers of $500 million to $1 billion.
Ms. Henry earned her J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School in 1989, where she was an Associate Editor of the University of Chicago Law Review and Hinton Moot Court Champion, and her B.A., magna cum laude, from Oklahoma Baptist University. She served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Irving L. Goldberg of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. She is licensed in the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania and admitted before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Eleventh, D.C., and Federal Circuits.
Ms. Henry is ranked by Chambers USA for Insurance: Policyholder in the District of Columbia and listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Insurance Law (2023–2027) and Litigation – Insurance (2027). She was recognized by Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers for Insurance Coverage and is a past President of the National Association of Women Lawyers.
Ms. Henry is a member of the American Law Institute, the American Bar Association, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, and the District of Columbia Bar. She is a frequent author and speaker on insurance coverage issues, was named a JD Supra Readers’ Choice Top Author for insurance, and was recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll.
Ms. Henry has handled nearly every major property and casualty line, including directors and officers, cyber, environmental, products liability, property and business interruption, and wrap-up programs, in disputes spanning state and federal courts, arbitration, mediation, and state insurance commissioner proceedings. Her representative matters include contingent business interruption litigation for a Fortune 10 company arising from the 2011 Thailand flooding, asbestos and environmental coverage litigation for General Motors, and Clendenin Brothers, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Co., in which Maryland’s highest court held that a total pollution exclusion did not relieve the insurer of its duty to defend.
SESSION 1 – Pleading the Whole-Tower Coverage Action Before Underlying Limits Are Exhausted | 12:00pm – 1:00pm
This session examines the California Supreme Court’s July 2026 decision in Fox Paine & Co. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. and its landmark holding that policyholders may sue excess insurers across an entire layered tower before underlying limits are exhausted. Attorneys will learn the new ‘reasonable likelihood’ pleading standard, how to structure a whole-tower complaint, and how the decision eliminates the serial-litigation staircase that previously forced insureds into successive policy-by-policy lawsuits. Attendees will leave with a practical framework for drafting declaratory relief claims against upper-layer excess carriers and for mapping policy language across layered programs to satisfy demurrer-proof factual pleading requirements.
BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
SESSION 2 – Proving Excess Insurer Bad Faith Before the Policy Attaches | 1:10pm – 2:10pm
This session examines how policyholder counsel can identify, plead, and prove bad faith claims against excess insurers before underlying limits are exhausted. Drawing on the California Supreme Court’s landmark Fox Paine decision and the emerging national landscape, attorneys will learn the specific pre-attachment conduct that triggers implied covenant liability, how to document and build the damages case, and how jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction variation shapes litigation strategy. Attendees will leave with a concrete proof framework applicable to multi-layer tower disputes.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General